It’s completely overwhelming. “30? 40? Uhh…” Trick question. You forgot to include the related sister brand IEMs. “So, like 45?” Something like that. Your guess is as good as mine these days. There is only one way that KZ can overcome the consumer, market and reviewer confusion and inevitable fatigue: they must continue to get better. Better sound. Better price. Better build. If KZ products do not constantly improve, the industry is going to stop paying attention. However, if they can continue to listen to customer feedback, and if they can tweak, and adjust, and live that industry buzzword of ‘continuous improvement’, KZ does have the potential to further cement their dominance in the ‘bang-for-the-buck’ Chi-Fi IEM category. So, have they done it with the $50, 6-driver per side, hybrid ZSX?
KZ Overview
KZ was founded in 2008 by classical musician Zen Li and former Audio-Technica engineer Keith Yue. It is a public brand for the Shenzhen Yuanze Electronics Company located in Guangdong, China. KZ has generated a huge amount of industry buzz by creating products that have seriously redefined the ratio of price to performance. There is seemingly unending hype over KZ (as of writing: approximately 3000 pages in a single Head-Fi post). The caveat? Most discussions conclude with the idea that although their IEMs may not produce the absolute best sound, they are difficult to beat at the low price point. Recently, some of their newer models, more technologically advanced and correspondingly higher-priced, have elevated the brand as a mainstream competitor. However, KZ has received criticism for copying the design and form factor of high-end models from Campfire Audio and Audio-Technica.
KZ IEM Series
KZ is also known for releasing many different models, so it gets convoluted when trying to figure out their hierarchy of IEMs. In a nutshell, the KZ offerings include the following series:
CCA and Tripowin
To further complicate things, KZ has recently started releasing IEMs under other brand names as well. Clear Concept Audio (CCA) and Tripowin are sister brands and have released very similar IEMs (sharing components, technology, design, ear tips, etc. with KZ models). While alike, the sister IEMs are slightly altered products than the KZ versions. Differences can include driver selection, cables, shape, internal structure, etc. and it varies by model. However, they are targeted at the very same budget IEM market.
CCA IEMs
C04: Hybrid – 1 BA + 1 DD. Similar to the KZ ZSN Pro housing design. Again # denotes total number of drivers per both IEMs. C10: Hybrid – 4 BA + 1 DD. Similar to the KZ ZSN housing design and the ZS10 driver lineup (but with a different dynamic driver). C12: Hybrid – 5 BA + 1 DD. Similar to the AS16 housing design and the ZSX driver lineup. Uses a single 300095 treble BA per side. C16: 8 BA. Similar to the AS10 housing design. 2x 22955 bass BA, 2x 29689 midrange BA and 4x 30095 treble BA per side. Differs from AS16 which uses 4x 31736 treble BA.
Tripowin IEMs
TP10: 5 BA. Similar to the AS16 housing design but with a flat front. 1x 22955 bass BA, 2x 29689 midrange BA and 2x 30095 treble BA per side.
The Challenge of In-Ear Monitor Reviews
I’d like to add a caveat. IEMs are notoriously difficult to review and compared to full-size headphones, it is problematic to trust that review findings will be applicable to all readers. While the size of one’s ear may impact the comfort or the sound of a full-size headphone, small details like the inner shape of a reviewer’s ear and the fit of an IEM greatly impacts not just the listener’s comfort but dramatically changes the perceived performance of an IEM. This is compounded by the plethora of ear tip sizes, materials, and shapes (which may or may not be included with the IEM) all of which uniquely fit different people. Most significantly, the quality of the ear tip seal within the ear changes the sound. So, beware dear reader, what suits one reviewer may not be applicable to you.
Technical Specifications
Drivers: 5BA+1DD Impedance: 24 Ohm Sensitivity: 111 dB Frequency Response: 7Hz – 40 kHz Cord Length: 125 cm Plug Type: 3.5 mm Plug Mic: Optional Colors: Black, Purple, Cyan
Packaging and Accessories
Absolutely nothing new here. You get the smaller book style KZ black box with a foam insert and an engraved metal plate. The IEMs are safely nestled in the black foam, although the right side one is labeled “left” on the foam and vice versa. Pulling out the foam with the small loop on the bottom will net you:
Cable. A bag containing 3 pairs (small, medium and large) of star patterned silicone ear tips. The ear tips on the IEMs themselves appear to be large-sized but are not star-patterned. Warranty card. 12 months if sold by KZ official store. Instruction card. Quality control card (not actually initialed or filled in).
Cable
The cable is the same bronze-colored version included with the newest KZ headphones (AS12, AS16, ZSN, ZSN Pro, ZS10 Pro, and ZST Pro). It features 2-pin 0.75mm (C-style) connectors to fit over the protruding sockets on the IEM body. The cable has a couple of inches of memory-shaping stiff wire to personalize the fit over the ear.
Build Quality
The ZSX features a new zinc alloy faceplate with a concentric wave pattern similar to the AS16, but it protrudes more and is not flush with the body. The faceplate tapers to a narrow point and ends in a fairly sharp edge. Thankfully, this edge is purely decorative, outside the ear, and cannot be felt when wearing. Unlike the shiny ZS10 Pro, the brushed finish doesn’t show fingerprints. “12 Hybrid” is printed cleanly in the center of the plate. Like other models, the metal faceplate is set firmly into the acrylic body. The body is standard KZ translucent resin construction with 2 vent holes on the inner surface. It does sport a brand-new shape that is more intricate than the old half-moon contour of the AS10. It looks almost like a custom IEM and appears shaped specifically to fit the ear with a variety of protrusions and curvatures. While I found the ZSX very comfortable and it fit my ears well, the shape and size may not work for all ears. The ZSX have a fairly mid-level insertion depth and provide decent isolation. The nozzle tips are a shiny silver metal construction (unlike the gold color of the ZS10 Pro) but they do share the same small circular-holed silver screen of the ZS10 Pro. “KZ-ZSX” and “Right” or “Left” are printed near the nozzle in a stylized font. Overall, the design of the ZSX is unique, clean and very well put together.
Driver Configuration
With previous models, KZ has listed the driver models quite prominently in ads and copy. For some (unknown-to-me) reason, this isn’t the case with the KSX. The two double mid and mid-high frequency balanced armature drivers are Bellsing DWEK but the model numbers are not specified. The single 30095 high frequency balanced armature driver looks to be positioned in the nozzle. KZ has experimented with this sort of arrangement before, with mixed results. In some cases, such as the ZS5 v2, this led to a harsh treble response.
10mm dynamic driver: new dual-magnet design dual DWEK mid-frequency BAs dual DWEK mid-high frequency BAs 300095 high-frequency BA Electronic crossover
Sound Quality
I listened to the ZSX with a variety of sources including the Hagerman Tuba amplifier, JDS Labs C5D DAC/Amp and directly from my iPhone X dongle. The combination of low-impedance and high-efficiency makes the ZSX perfectly able to be driven from a decent portable source. IEMs are all about portability, so as a result the bulk of my listening was done directly from the iPhone dongle. This is a very fun sounding IEM. I’m quickly becoming a card-carrying fanboy of hybrid IEMs with the combination of fast and detailed balanced armatures paired with a dynamic driver for deep bass. It wasn’t very long ago that this magical combo could only be found in megabuck models. This is a terrific time for budget personal Hi-Fi. KZ was notorious for an unbalanced v-shaped sound in their early models. This has changed. The last few models have sounded much more balanced and cohesive. The v-shape has been tamed to a fun, but more refined sound signature. I’m happy to report that the ZSX is following this trend and the sound quality far exceeds its modest price point.
Bass
Here’s where things are really fun. The new 10mm driver is punchy and tight. It stays clean, doesn’t overpower the other frequencies and maintains a decent overall balance. Low bass response is very decent and the mid-bass is forward in the mix and, as a result is very engaging. Rock, EDM or Hip-Hop fans will find a lot to like with the ZSX. It hits hard but with control and finesse.
Midrange
The midrange is always the weakest part of the house KZ sound. With the ZSX the midrange is reasonably forward with decent body but just doesn’t deliver to the same extent as the upper and lower frequencies. There is very little treble or bass bleed over, so the midrange, while somewhat recessed in the mix, stays clear and detailed. Voices come across natural and female vocals seem to shine a bit more than male. Honestly, the midrange is fine, it just doesn’t have quite the ‘wow’ factor as the bass and treble.
Treble
There is an abundance of bright detail available. The ZSX treble is quite extended and somewhat elevated, but the balanced armatures remain clear and reasonably free of sibilance or fatigue. The treble is a great counterpoint to all that tight bass on the other end. Overall the sound signature remains balanced but nicely extended (both high and low). Music is presented cleanly, clearly and powerfully. The ZSX is a very energetic sounding IEM; super-engaging and fun.
Compared to the ZS10 Pro
I really like the ZS10 Pro, so the obvious question is the 6-driver (per IEM) ZSX an upgrade over the 5-driver ZS10 Pro? I prefer the smaller size and overall aesthetics of the ZS10 Pro, but it’s a close thing. Both fit my ears comfortably and look quite good. Sound quality is also quite similar, but I believe the nod has to go to the new challenger. The ZSX highs are a bit clearer and more detailed. Overall the sound is a tad more forward and engaging. Bass, while perhaps a little less deep than the ZS10 Pro, is better controlled and cleaner on the ZSX. This isn’t to say that the ZS10 Pro isn’t still a great budget IEM. (It is!) The ZS10 Pro and the ZSX are incredibly similar products, at virtually the same price point, and released by the same manufacturer within a few months. No wonder online forums are full of folks asking which one they should buy.
Conclusion
Practice is indeed making perfect for KZ. They continue to release a flood of new models, and it can feel like each new IEM is a beta test for the next one, but they really do keep getting better. If you listened to earlier models and wrote them off, now is the time to give KZ another chance. Remember, this is another budget IEM model around $50. KZ recently experimented with a higher price point with the AS16, but at $100+, the standard bundle of accessories, build, and sound quality wasn’t quite as compelling. With the ZS10 Pro and now the ZSX, KZ has made strides to (ahem) terminate the competition at this lower (very affordable) price point. Perhaps KZ is actually run by an evil AI known as Skynet. Perhaps they are using future technology and sending it back in time to change the present. Perhaps they are just making excellent bang-for-the-buck hybrid IEMs. No matter. If future KZ offerings continue to improve on the ZSX, I say, “all hail our evil computer overlords!”
